In Recess #4: "Stone Soup"

We’re just three weeks from the start of a blockbuster new Term at the Court, but don’t let that fool you: the Conference remains largely inert, essentially daring us to produce an episode with the scraps they’ve handed us. Challenge accepted. This week, we discuss (3:00) the release of the November calendar, as well as the common-law right to wear a costume on Halloween at oral argument. We also dive deep (8:45) on summer grants, what they are, and how they work, as well as (12:15) the Court’s summer grant in Murphy v. Smith, a case about attorney’s fees in prisoners' civil rights cases. We also talk about (15:00) the Ninth Circuit’s latest ruling in the travel-ban case, Hawaii v. Trump—or “Hawai’i,” as at least one of us says. From there, we argue a little bit (22:00) about Justice Gorsuch addressing a classically named D.C. junket, hosted at a hotel that really ruined one of our lunch hour, as well as (30:30) the amicus brief filed by Senators McCain and Whitehouse in Gill v. Whitford, the major partisan-gerrymandering case that’ll be argued in the October sitting.

Most importantly, we're joined this week (36:00) by Willy Jay, the co-chair of Goodwin’s Appellate Litigation Practice, who was in a previous life one of the few Assistants to the Solicitor General who could convincingly endure the existence of the Bristow Fellows. We talked with him (42:00) about the need for, and drawbacks of, specialization for a private lawyer building a Supreme Court practice; the internal structure of the Solicitor General’s office (45:00); the business case for appellate practices generally (53:00); and the nature of the Supreme Court’s IP docket, and how it has come to suit appellate generalists (56:45).

If you’re enjoying First Mondays, you can get every episode automatically by subscribing (for free!) in your favorite podcast client. And if you understandably can’t get enough, backers on Patreon get access to bonus episodes, as well as access to the Amici chatroom on Slack.

Amici Teaser: "Rotten Fruit Juice"

We’re still about a month away from the kick-off of OT2017, and the Court has been pretty quiet. But we’ve been hard at working making some bonus episodes for our Patreon subscribers. First, we talked a little longer to John Elwood, who you heard a couple of weeks ago in the episode "Third Class Webelo." Turns out, he’s kind of a big deal. Then, this week, we got out of the law school and into the vineyard with professional wine consultant Danielle Callegari. They’re both great conversations, and they’ll help tide you over until Court is in session. Become a subscriber at patreon.com/firstmondays. It’s just five bucks a month, and you’ll get to hear all the rest of the bonus episodes we’ve made. Thanks for listening, and stay firstie.
 

In Recess #3: "Third Class Webelo"

While Ian is off on a boat somewhere, or maybe in the wilderness of Croatia (we're not super sure), Dan and Leah get up to speed on a surprisingly busy summer week at the Supreme Court. In additions to some briefs showing up, one case got the DIG treatment. And it's a bankruptcy case, so we bring in resident bankruptcy expert Danielle D'Onfro to make it understandable for the rest of us. Then, we have an interview with the great John Elwood, partner in Vinson & Elkins' Appellate practice group, and creator of SCOTUSblog's Relist Watch

In Recess #2: "#BadLawyerGate"

To celebrate our new partnership with SCOTUSblog, we're unlocking one of our favorite bonus episodes for everyone to enjoy.

We talk about the problem of unprepared counsel refusing to give up Supreme Court oral arguments to more experienced attorneys. We discuss why the problem exists, the ethical conundrums it creates, and what, if anything, can be done to fix it. By far the best part of the episode, though, is an interview with legendary Supreme Court practitioner Lisa Blatt, who at the time of recording was sitting on an unbelievable 32-2 record in the Supreme Court, and who has since then improved to an even more mind-boggling 33-2.  Lisa explains her unorthodox argument preparation techniques, helps us understand why she’s been such a consistent winner, and offers her thoughts on the problem of unprepared oral advocates. We had a great discussion, and you won’t want to miss it. 

To listen to the rest of our bonus episodes, visit patreon.com/firstmondays. Five bucks a month gets you access to all the ones we've put out so far, and all the ones we have coming up. 

In Recess #1: "Crushing Negs"

The Supreme Court maybe now be in recess for the summer, but there's still lots going on. In our universe, we're pumped for a new partnership with everyone's favorite Supreme Court website, SCOTUSblog. Not to be confused with the Supreme Court's actual website, which got a much-anticipated makeover sometime after we recorded this episode. We catch you up on the latest happenings in the big travel ban case—as well as what RBG had to say about it. Plus, the October argument calendar was released, and those two weeks alone are already more interesting than all of OT2016 combined (sorry, OT2016 clerks!). Finally, we had a great conversation with Kannon Shanmugam, SCOTUS advocate extraordinaire and head of Williams & Connolly's Supreme Court and Appellate Litigation practice, who talked to us about being on the winning end of Justice Gorsuch's first majority opinion and more. 

If you want to hear more from Kannon, the latest Patreon bonus episode is an extended interview with him. Subscribe for just $5/month and find out which opinion by Justice Scalia Kannon has framed on his wall, hear Kannon's thoughts on amici coordination and ghostwriting briefs in opposition, and learn how he prepares for oral argument. Plus get the whole back catalog of bonus episodes, too.

The Annual: OT2016 in Review (ft. Nina Totenberg)

It’s the finale of our first season! To celebrate all that was OT2016, and to look to the year ahead, we went to the queen of SCOTUS radio herself: Nina Totenberg. We also dish out superlatives— best dig at an advocate, best quip in an argument, worst opinion, etc. And you’ll notice that we replaced the theme music with something a little more, well, custom. Thanks for an amazing first season of First Mondays, and #stayfirstie.

Much like the justices, we’ll be switching to a summer schedule. You can expect two episode a month, and if that’s not enough, become a Patreon subscriber to get two bonus episodes each month, too! Sign up for just $5/month at patreon.com/firstmondays.

OT2016 #27: "Not Respectfully"

We couldn't possibly keep it short for the last recap episode of OT16. We all know the last week of the term means all the blockbuster opinions get announced, and we're here to help you make sense of them. And for Trinity Lutheran and the travel ban, we call in the big guns in the form of Professor Marty Lederman. So while you're driving to a cookout or watching fireworks in the back of a pickup truck, celebrate the good ol' US of A by listening to two glorious hours about her Supreme Court.

OT2016 #26: "Five Point Palm Exploding Heart Technique"

It’s the penultimate recap for the term, wherein the justices hath bestowed upon us twelve (12) new opinions in one week. Time for a lengthy—but spirited—Opin-o-rama! We pick out a few of our favorites to go in depth, and then we institute Lightning Round Rules to cover the rest. Then, it’s time for some game theory, so they say, as we try to figure out who is writing which of the remaining six opinions. Welcome to the Cyber Age, and thanks for listening.

OT2016 #25: "Little Longer in the Oven"

With just a couple of weeks to go, we're racing toward the OT2016 finish line. Plenty of blunders, orders, and opinions to address-- including Justice Gorsuch's first opinion. Plus, we'll discuss one of the biggest cases of the year that has, in our opinion, made the world worse.

If you're enjoying the show, there are two ways you can help us out! Rate and review us on iTunes, and donate to our Patreon campaign for access to some sweet perks.

OT2016 #24: "Six Degrees of Caleb Nelson"

We hash out another week of SCOTUS news, this time with guest host Leah Litman. Yes, we recap orders and opinions, but more importantly, we finally solve a weeks-long First Monday mystery: who began the clerks' happy hour tradition? And don't stop listening after the credits. Leah came armed with Beckles-related puns, and you need them in your life.

If you want more First Mondays, become a monthly subscriber at patreon.com/firstmondays. For just $5/month, you get bonus episodes and access to the Amici Slack channel, where you can procrastinate with fellow Firsties. Feeling generous? Want a leg up on your coworkers or classmates? Donating $20/month gets you access to live streams of us recording the episodes that everyone else hears days later. 

OT2016 #23: "A Necessary Evil"

We made time in the midst of wedding festivities to (finally!) talk about the Travel Ban, which will soon reach the Court; we cover some interesting orders, including a mysterious attorney discipline case involving a case of mistaken identity; we recap all four of last week's opinions, including smackdowns of the repeat-offender Montana Supreme Court and Federal Circuit; and we game out the outstanding opinion assignments. 

In lieu of a wedding gift, dedicated Firsties can express their appreciation of the show by rating and reviewing on the iTunes store and by backing the show on Patreon.

OT2016 #22: "Golden Phoenix"

After a brief break for a trip to Vegas, we're back with a jackpot of opinions to recap. Yep, we go all in on each of the six opinions that have been released in the last couple of weeks. We've got everything from gerrymandering to patents to arbitration agreements to bankruptcy. Plenty to keep you entertained while you're stuck in holiday traffic.

But, if it's not enough, you can always binge on our bonus episodes by becoming a Patreon subscriber. Five bucks a month gets you all the supreme content you could ask for. 

OT2016 #21: "Good Snake"

As we ease into the argument-free season of the term, we recap some grants, take a look at the opinion in Bank of America Corp. v. Miami, and relish a great hotline call full of 90s clerking gossip. And speaking of gossip, what's the deal with Justice Gorsuch not joining the cert pool? We have some theories.

If you want the full story on the cert pool be sure to back us on Patreon. Next week we'll have a full bonus episode dedicated to the subject!

OT2016 #20: "Who Is Calling Justice Breyer?"

Arguments for October Term 2016 are over—it's orders and opinions from here on out. Meanwhile, Justice Gorsuch has started voting on stuff at conference, and we're here to bring you the blockbuster news on his very first official vote. We also talk more about the debate over the Court's death penalty docket; recap the opinion in the I-can't-believe-this-case-name-is-real Lewis v. Clarke, about (no kidding) Indian law; look back on the SG's rough day in Maslenjak, a case about immaterial lies in citizenship applications; talk more about the nature of personal jurisdiction as we recap Bristol-Myers; and, in the aftershow, play another round of our new favorite game, "Firstie Impression." Or, possibly, "Q Priori." Or, possibly, "Feynman's Questions." The game has a lot of names.

First Mondays is supported by our Patreon backers. Join today for just a few bucks a month and you'll get access to exclusive bonus episodes. The latest one, about the "summer camp" aspects of being a Supreme Court clerk, is up now, and backers can enjoy all the previous bonus episodes, too—including interviews with Lisa Blatt about her oral-argument preparation strategies, Misha Tseytlin on being a Young S.G., and more. Backers also get access to our exclusive Slack, and a whole lot of other great stuff.

OT2016 #19: "Cusp of a Revelation"

It was a pretty big week at the Supreme Court. First, we talk about what the heck is going with expiring execution drugs in Arkansas, and how that plays out within SCOTUS chambers. Then, for the first time since the beginning of this podcast, we had nine justices at oral argument. And even though Perry v. Merit Systems Protections Board is kind of a boring case, Justice Gorsuch gave us something to talk about. Then, we get into the long-awaited Trinity Lutheran playground case, complete with audio from Justices Kennedy and Breyer. Finally, it's our last oral argument preview of the term-- but don't worry, we still have a couple months of opinions to look forward to.

If you want more First Mondays, become a monthly subscriber at patreon.com/firstmondays. For just $5/month, you get bonus episodes and access to the Amici Slack channel, where you can procrastinate with fellow Firsties. Feeling generous? Want a leg up on your coworkers or classmates? Donating $20/month gets you access to live streams of us recording the episodes that everyone else hears days later. 

OT2016 #18: "Not Exactly Mr. Bluebook"

It's the beginning of the end for OT2016— the first week of the last set of arguments of the term. We're coming at you with two big previews. First, what do old tires and religious expression have to do with each other? Oh, only the biggest case of the year, probably: Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Comer. And then, just how ineffective does counsel have to be for it to truly prejudice the client? Plus, we've got hotline calls, a new QP game, and a tantalizing preview of a much-sought-after brief from Texas.

First Mondays is supported by our generous listeners. Become a Patreon backer and we'll thank you with gifts like bonus episodes, a donors-only chat room, and live streams.

Amici Teaser: "Let Me Tell You How Sweet It Is"

We've been cranking out some awesome interview shows for our Patreon subscribers. And if you're not one of them, well, you're missing out. Here are snippets from the two most recent bonus episodes: one with Rakesh Kilaru, former associate counsel to President Obama, and one with Misha Tseytlin, Solicitor General of Wisconsin. If you want to hear the rest of their conversations, it's not too late to become a Patreon subscriber! Your monthly donations help us keep growing, improving, and doing more episodes with the experts you want to hear from. 

Good Behaviour #4: "The Justin Bieber Standard"

In our fourth episode of tracking Judge Neil Gorsuch's nomination to the Supreme Court, we get into the greatest hits of his confirmation hearings. How do you pronounce his name? Does the "frozen trucker case" invoke the absurdity doctrine? Which Democrat Senator threw him a "softball" of a question?

Plus, we'll do some quick recaps of arguments and opinions, which may involve another inductee to the #BadLawyerGate Hall of Fame. And stick around after the music for a friendly discussion of amicus briefs (get it? friendly!). 

If you want more First Mondays, become a monthly subscriber at patreon.com/firstmondays. For just $5/month, you get bonus episodes and access to the Amici Slack channel, where you can procrastinate with fellow Firsties. Feeling generous? Want a leg up on your coworkers or classmates? Donating $20/month gets you access to live streams of us recording the episodes that everyone else hears days later.